OAN Loses All But Most Insignificant Sliver Of Breach Of Contract Case Against AT&T In CA, Refiles It In DC As Tort Suit
Well, they already had it drafted. Don't want to waste a pleading.
Well, they already had it drafted. Don't want to waste a pleading.
Slight exaggeration, which OAN is no doubt entirely comfortable with.
The new generation of AI-related legal issues are inherently cross-disciplinary, implicating corporate law, intellectual property, data privacy, employment, corporate governance and regulatory compliance.
And how far can you stretch this for a party?
This is not a great look for a Biglaw firm.
Lotsa luck with that one.
Of all the parties who should stay the hell away from defamation suits ...
Takeaways from a Legalweek panel on evolving malpractice risks.
'We can take all his money without all the defamation suits, right?' say OAN executives wrongly.
* Attorneys in DC can now accept cryptocurrency as a form of payment. As detailed in yesterday's Morning Docket, accepting cocaine as a form of payment is still off limits... [Bloomberg Law] * Florida's governor recently signed a new law requiring parental consent for abortions. [New York Daily News] * OAN has lost a defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, and now they may have to pay the legal fees for her high-priced Biglaw attorneys. [San Diego Times] * A Baltimore family is suing a local restaurant for refusing service to them based on how they were dressed. [TMZ] * A judge has dismissed a New York lawyer's defamation lawsuit against someone who called him an "ambulance chaser" online. This attorney should brush up on his First Amendment law. [Westfair Communications]